Rick Piltz of @govacctproj @climatesciwatch was potent force for limiting political efforts to torque science findings. Untimely passing.

Here he explains his role.

Here’s the first 2005 Times story built on docs he gave me.

Here’s my piece on the White House climate science editor (Phil Cooney) moving to ExxonMobil.

 Here’s our story on a 2007 House hearing on the climate documents and White House practices.

.@ICTBizJournal Q&A with @Koch_Industries CEO Charles Koch skips global warming but includes telling nugget: 

Q: Your political views and involvement seem to garner the most headlines nationally these days. Why continue those investments, given the type of coverage it seems to have sparked?

A: It’s like Lee Trevino used to say, somebody asked him, “How are you winning all these golf tournaments?” and he said, “Well somebody has got to win them and it might as well be me.” That’s the way I am on this. There doesn’t seem to be any other large company trying to do this so it might as well be us. Somebody has got to work to save the country and preserve a system of opportunity.

Bravo, , for grilling Sen. @JohnCornyn this way: “Senator, isn’t there something wrong when you say “I won’t fund the government unless I can attach my personal wish list to the legislation every time we vote? I’d love to see the government find a cure for cancer, but I don’t think you can say I’m not going to pass and pass any funds for the rest of the government until the NIH finds a cure for cancer. I mean, isn’t that just kind of the same thing here?

Now there is legit reason to name hurricanes for obstructionist Republicans. (Climate was not one.) NOAA shifts spending to keep hurricane center going.

Now there is legit reason to name hurricanes for obstructionist Republicans. (Climate was not one.) NOAA shifts spending to keep hurricane center going.

With hurricane lull, hopefully won’t end up in “shock to trance” mode on coastal policy (as with energy policy).

With hurricane lull, hopefully won’t end up in “shock to trance” mode on coastal policy (as with energy policy).

A nice @ensia post on when science communication backfires, and why it’s still worth communicating.
Via @brainpicker, 40 maps that explain the world http://j.mp/15DIu3K  And 100 diagrams that changed it http://j.mp/15DItwt .

Via @brainpicker, 40 maps that explain the world And 100 diagrams that changed it .

Even after Obama climate speech, @UTenergypoll sees declines in % of Americans (GOP & Dem.) seeing climate change. Release:
Sixty-seven percent of Americans say that climate change is occurring, down from 73 percent in March, according to the latest survey conducted by the University of Texas Energy Poll. Eighteen percent of respondents say that climate change is not occurring and 15 percent report they don’t know.
The online nationwide survey, conducted July 18-22, indicates that although climate change can be a polarizing issue politically, both Democrats and Republicans experienced similar declines from where numbers were in March. Over the past four months, the percentage of Republicans who say that climate change is occurring dropped from 55 to 51 percent and Democrats decreased from 89 to 84 percent.
Children may also play a role in attitudes on climate change. Seventy-four percent of survey participants living with children under 18 years of age say that climate change is occurring, while just 62 percent of those living without children do.
This survey was conducted among 1,054 U.S. residents aged 18 and over. Data were weighted using U.S. Census Bureau figures, as well as propensity scores, to ensure the sample’s composition reflects the actual U.S. population. The poll was developed by the McCombs School of Business and launched in October 2011 to provide an objective, authoritative look at consumer attitudes and perspectives on key energy issues. It is designed to help inform national discussion, business planning and policy development.

Even after Obama climate speech, @UTenergypoll sees declines in % of Americans (GOP & Dem.) seeing climate change. Release:

Sixty-seven percent of Americans say that climate change is occurring, down from 73 percent in March, according to the latest survey conducted by the University of Texas Energy Poll. Eighteen percent of respondents say that climate change is not occurring and 15 percent report they don’t know.

The online nationwide survey, conducted July 18-22, indicates that although climate change can be a polarizing issue politically, both Democrats and Republicans experienced similar declines from where numbers were in March. Over the past four months, the percentage of Republicans who say that climate change is occurring dropped from 55 to 51 percent and Democrats decreased from 89 to 84 percent.

Children may also play a role in attitudes on climate change. Seventy-four percent of survey participants living with children under 18 years of age say that climate change is occurring, while just 62 percent of those living without children do.

This survey was conducted among 1,054 U.S. residents aged 18 and over. Data were weighted using U.S. Census Bureau figures, as well as propensity scores, to ensure the sample’s composition reflects the actual U.S. population. The poll was developed by the McCombs School of Business and launched in October 2011 to provide an objective, authoritative look at consumer attitudes and perspectives on key energy issues. It is designed to help inform national discussion, business planning and policy development.

Revisiting ‘11 post on whiplash effect as science & society intersect[S]cience is a stutter-step, hopscotch style journey full of zigs and zags on all kinds of timescales. When you put that kind of process in the distorting environment of a policy fight, the temptation to overstate (in both directions) is essentially akin to a “positive feedback,” to adopt the parlance of climate research.

 

Jim Hansen seeks a third political party centered on fee-dividend climate approach:  ”[W]e are near a point when the American people should contemplate a centrist third party…

I was in government 40 years, long enough to understand how aging organizations can evolve into self-licking ice cream cones, organizations whose main purpose becomes self-perpetuation rather than accomplishment of their supposed objectives. The public can see this tendency in our politicians, our Congress, and our major political parties.

Our government has failed to address climate, energy, and economic challenges. These challenges, addressed together, actually can be a great opportunity. Our democracy and economic system still have great potential for innovation and rapid adoption of improved technologies, if the government provides the right conditions and gets out of the way.

The Solution is Not Rocket Science

Conservatives and liberals alike can recognize the merit of honest pricing of fossil fuels. Fossil fuels today receive subsidies and do not pay their costs to society. Human health costs of pollution from fossil fuel burning and fossil fuel mining are borne by the public. Climate disruption costs are borne by the victims and all taxpayers.

This market distortion makes our economy less efficient and less competitive. Fixing this problem is not rocket science. The solution can be simple and transparent….  READ ON